Sounds alright, we will just have to wait n see
Sent from my TR718D
No we should not have a carbon tax.
Yes we should have a carbon tax now.
We should give it some more time.
Just for Ving.... Gravy.
Tax everything except photographic equipment.
In my case $763 per year out but only $306 per year back. A little maths and we are $457 per year worse off, or $8.79 per week worse off, even before the effect of rising prices. For what I may well ask ... hmmmm ... $4 billion just to administer the scheme over the next 4 years before a single ounce of carbon is saved with my dollar? I'm sure I remember saying something about a revenue raising scheme rather than a serious attempt to reduce carbon pollution. At least my car is exempt at the pump!
Waz
Be who you are and say what you mean, because those who matter don't mind don't matter and those who mind don't matter - Dr. Seuss...
D700 x 2 | Nikkor AF 50 f/1.8D | Nikkor AF 85 f/1.8D | Optex OPM2930 tripod/monopod | Enthusiasm ...
Canon 50D - Zuiko 28/2.8 50/1.8 100/2.8 - Tokina 11-16/2.8
welcome to the moneygoround....
does it irk you that if us humans werent on this planet then 96 - 98% of the current CO2 production would still be occurring... and yet all this fuss and bother is still happening.
hey I am not against the tax, I am getting extra money.
All a bit of moot point now isn't it?
Since Julia has announced her deal. Should there be another poll to see if attitudes have changed?
Minus all the facts and figures. as in;
Yes. I think that i will be better off with a carbon tax.
No. I think I'll be worse off with the carbon tax.
Gravey. Goes well with roast lamb.
Last edited by geoffsta; 11-07-2011 at 5:00pm.
Geoff
Honesty is best policy.
CC is always welcome
Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
Flickr
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff