Do you use social media in relation to your photography?
Do you use social media in relation to your photography?
Do you mean whether we post images on the likes of Facebook, Twitter...?
If so, then No/nihil/нет/όχι.../etc, from me
CC, Image editing OK.
Yes, but social sharing only and quite sporadically. Most of my contents are grabs I find interesting from my phone rather than anything from my camera, partially cos my camera lacks any form of wireless communication.
Nikon FX + m43
davophoto.wordpress.com
Instagram only.
Forget Twit Sphere and Faeces Book ...
What was the first one you said?
It would appear to be muck from the same stable as Fbook
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instagram
Last edited by ameerat42; 26-03-2018 at 9:28pm.
I post interesting or pretty photos on FB for friends and family. I'd rather people got 5 seconds of pleasure looking at something they don't normally see, than reading some dreary rubbish about how awful the world is. Always place a watermark now. Feels a bit pretentious since I'm just a beginner but my photos are improving
Thanks for that link, Am. An interesting read. The male/female ratio of Instagram makes it a better place than many IMO. Lack of EXIF data on images also helps ...
While I didn't know it was owned by FB, it is certainly a very different model. I have all my info locked down as tightly as I can on both. I am member of a private FB group focusing on local photography with my cameras of choice. It's years since I participated in it.
I use FB in a community group that is local, it's good for ppl that can't get about like us agile photographers. FB basically renders the image unusable in regards to resolution but a watermark helps. Just started a Instagram account but don't fully understand it.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Filter
EOS R & 16-35 f4 EF, 70-200 2.8 RF
Olympus OMD-EM1 Mark II 7-14 12-40 40-150 Pro lens.
EOS 7D Mark II - 70D - Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM, 17 - 55 2.8 Lenses
There are many many marvellous photographers on Instagram. Great for inspiration. Start by searching by topic - astro or waterfalls or portraits etc. You don't need aphone, in fact using a fomputer means you can view the photos quite a bit larger. Still not high def, but about the same a AP comps.
Sent from a mobile thing.
The last time I posted a photo on Facebook would be close to a year ago in Vanuatu. Basically just letting my family know all was well and that we were warm in the middle of winter in Australia.
If I can get decent wifi I might do the same this year in June when we are overseas.
So yeah, extremely infrequent for me.
Oh, just had a revelation. My brother-in-law asked me to post some macro shots at the back end of last year when we were both getting into it at the same time.
So for me, maybe two or three times a year I might put photos on Facebook?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you mean by "social media"?
Everybody uses the term as if it meant something, but no-one seems to know what it is they mean. Most people seem to think it is a synonym for "gigantic American companies that spy on you and sell your personal data to scum like Trump and Putin".
I daresay I'd better use the same meaning in my answer, which is "no".
It dozen matter if you have 12 meanings: they'd all be meaningless.
- And stop comparing yourself to the phabled Philistines and Luddites.
OK, what do you mean by it?
Genuine question. I have never yet seen a proper definition of the term. People use it all the time, but seem to have no clear idea of what they mean by it. "Facebook and stuff" seems to be about as precise as it gets. (Which is not to say precise at all.) Does it have an actual meaning?
This will save me some typing -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media
If you're bored -
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=w...LaHu8wfVqI_ACw
By the time I'd finished typing/correcting the text below, Jim had replied.
I'm addressing Tannin's post
Whoo, a minute! Are you thinking there would be an absolute one?
The best one might hope for would be some loose connection between
"social" ~ "society" (itself a loose description) allied with some modicum
of interaction-con*-communication - assigned the moniker "media".
But it's all commercial trickle-down that nets savvy parties certain rewards.
But on the +ve side, it does allow a sort of easy means of communication.
(From what I can understand)
* con: a necessary misspelling of the Latin c space u space m, which was
hashed out by the profanity-checker
Last edited by ameerat42; 27-03-2018 at 10:06pm.
Zuckerberg alone owns about $70 billion worth of Facebook shares.
That's pretty insane that a 'thing' that's hardly tangible in a sense, can be worth that amount of money.