View Full Version : Image Stabilisation - lens vs sensor
etherial
14-07-2011, 6:43pm
I often see arguments about lens vs sensor image stabilisation.
Here is Nikon's view. (https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/23997/session/L3RpbWUvMTMxMDM4MzY2Mi9zaWQvUlV6Y3ZJeWs%3D)
Makes sense to me!
I won't need to read it to say it makes sense to me too
They would say that wouldn't they? ( http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mandy_Rice-Davies ) :rolleyes:
Pentax gives you both options, in body and with Sigma releasing OS on longer FL lenses for Pentax - can't lose.
Every lens is stabilised with Pentax.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=19647176
etherial
14-07-2011, 7:33pm
:lol:, two predictable replies! :D
LOL, two predictable replies! :-D
:D
LOL, two predictable replies! :-D
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Lol, quite
So If I chime in and say that, for bird photography, you really need to go with Canon or Nikon and the Nikon long glass is just as good as the Canon but costs a lot more for no good reason ... we would have three entirely predictable replies?
So If I chime in and say that, for bird photography, you really need to go with Canon or Nikon and the Nikon long glass is just as good as the Canon but costs a lot more for no good reason ... we would have three entirely predictable replies?
LOL quite
Can I suggest that I agree with Kym's predictable reply and add that Sony also offer in body for all lenses and with sigma IS on longer lenses, we have a choice :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.