nIKON 24-120 F4

[hourican]

Has anyone got one or tried one and whats the thoughts is it worth the $1500 or would you go the 28-300 3.5-5.6 @ $1000 ??

[Darey]

It's difficult to help you if we don't know if you are shooting FX or DX etc.

If you shoot DX you will get a coverage equivalent to 50mm - 210mm in FX terms.
I think the 28 - 300 may be more versatile.

[Darey]

Delete - accidental repeat message.

[hourican]

Darey

Nikon D700 and waiting patiently for an upgrade trvelling overseas early next year 6wks total round europe and trying to lighten the load taking lowepro aw 400 nikon 14-24 f2.8
70 -200 f2.8 ??? 50mm f1.4 SB900 have 24-70 f2.8 also but it is starting to get a bit weighty wondering if 28-300 is any good and will it replace the 24-70 and 70-200 or will i regret not taking the full kit. Gets heavy after days walking 5 kids and wife in tow by the way.???

[rwg717]

Probably the wrong person to comment on this but I actually have a D60 with the 24-120 f3.5-5.6G IF ED, not sure if this is the same lens you are after but I think its a brilliant piece of glass, only piece of Nikon gear I have and every bit as good as my Canon equipment:confused013
Richard