Who needs a camera?

[WhoDo]

Finger painting on the iPad is sooooo much easier, isn't it? :p


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEdRLlqdgA4

[ROA44]

Yep definitely still need a camera, & don't have 200hours to sit around trying to do that.

[Mary Anne]

Interesting though I wonder how long it took that artist to do it..

[paulheath]

200+ hours it says on video and ROA44 mentioned it Mary Anne

[arthurking83]

My thoughts mirror RO's .... why do it in 200 hours when it so much quicker to do it at 1/200s.

LOL! .. while I can understand the interest in the 'art' of it .. that still represents 144 billionths of the time taken to achieve a similar result using fingerpainting.

It's still an interesting concept tho.

[Mary Anne]

Thanks Paul I was turning up my speaker and missed the beginning to find there was only music anyway.
I did see that on ROA44 reply and thought he was only assuming that many hours :lol2: What a waste of time.

[I @ M]

Who needs a camera?

I do because I don't do apple unless it is in a pie. :p

[old dog]

285,000 brush strokes.....thats a lot of brushes used up. Costly business.......I`ll keep the camera. Pretty cool though.

[Bennymiata]

Whoever did it, has a very talented finger.

[arthurking83]

I suppose I have a temperamentally talented finger .. my RH index finger(primarily used for pressing shutter buttons) ..... hardly ever used for fingerpainting tho.


The other thought that crossed my mind on this topic ...

200+ hours at approximately minimum wages( @ roughly $20-30) equates to about $4000-$6000 worth of finger talent used here.

$4000-6000 dollars goes a long way towards some serious photography gear! :p